shygye Posted July 19, 2009 Report Share Posted July 19, 2009 This is just it, the fire was so hot it caused the buildings to fall, first time in history? including 1 that wasn't even hit? yet clothing survived? and as I recall...all the crap in those building was supposed to be fire resistant? as in it wasn't supposed to fuel the fire...I also recall reading that volume of fuel was supposed to burn up in like 12 minutes?, if at all...jet fuel needs to be atomized to burn...and the black smoke indicated the fire was smothering itself due to lack of oxygen... Ok so this happened, no denying that...I just don't buy the "official" story at all. Now on to a different topic...anyone think Osama Bin Laden actually exists? or is still alive? The building codes require the structural steel to be INSULATED for fire resistance. The insulation for the WTC was sprayed on the steel beams. The aircraft impact blew the insulation off the steel, exposing it to the high temperatures. Plus the impact destroyed several of the supports thus placing additional stress on the remaining supports. Plus the impact destroyed the sprinkler system. There is no other skyscraper that has suffered the combination of high impact, structural damage, loss of insulation, and fire that instantaneously spread over the 400000 sq ft! The other building not hit by aircraft was damaged by falling debris from the WTC. As for Osama, only the good die young. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old Hippie Posted July 19, 2009 Report Share Posted July 19, 2009 Now answer my question, if it came out that 9/11 was a rigged job, or there were lies etc involved, would you be shocked? Never mind the fire, do you really think you are being told 100% of the truth/details? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shygye Posted July 19, 2009 Report Share Posted July 19, 2009 Does anyone tell you 100% of the truth/details? After the event, there was a massive CYA situation. The military, CIA, NSA, FAA, and FBI all were busy deflecting blame. I would be very surprised if it was a rigged job. Those that make the claim have no detailed knowledge of how a controlled demolition works. It takes weeks of work to go throughout the building to weaken the load bearing supports BEFORE the explosive charges are placed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hugh_Hoy Posted July 19, 2009 Report Share Posted July 19, 2009 Gulf of Tonkin incident has now been reveled to be faked. And look up something called Operation Northwoods. Considering how they flat-out ignored the Constitution and the law of the land, I would put nothing past those in power in 2001-2008. Cheers, SD Tonkin was under LBJ. HH Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hugh_Hoy Posted July 19, 2009 Report Share Posted July 19, 2009 Well, among the tin hat brigade here, there are those who still think Oliver Stone's "JFK" was the true story. Gawd, the "conspiracy" goof balls couldn't even agree on "who done it". CIA, Mafia...Castro...some OC type who'd been deported. Even the "grassy knoll" has been debunked. Still, there are those who blah, blah, blah and ignore the fact that over a million pages of declassified documents and evidence have yet to come close to promoting a serious "conspiracy". HH Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flashermac Posted July 19, 2009 Report Share Posted July 19, 2009 Onassis did it so he could get Jackie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cavanami Posted July 19, 2009 Author Report Share Posted July 19, 2009 I don't blame him, she was hot at that time! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bangkoktraveler Posted July 19, 2009 Report Share Posted July 19, 2009 Stick no explanation why the third building collapsed like a demolition? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bangkoktraveler Posted July 19, 2009 Report Share Posted July 19, 2009 As for Bin Laden, on the day of the attack, he was accused of the attack. Still no trial. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old Hippie Posted July 19, 2009 Report Share Posted July 19, 2009 Well, among the tin hat brigade here, there are those who still think Oliver Stone's "JFK" was the true story. Gawd, the "conspiracy" goof balls couldn't even agree on "who done it". CIA, Mafia...Castro...some OC type who'd been deported. Even the "grassy knoll" has been debunked. Still, there are those who blah, blah, blah and ignore the fact that over a million pages of declassified documents and evidence have yet to come close to promoting a serious "conspiracy". HH perhaps because millions more pages have not been released? This was the most photographed murder in history, yet the government confiscated as much of the film as they could, and still has not released it? too many "coincidences" here. I learned a long time ago to NEVER trust the government, NEVER! A hell of a lot of people were very happy when Kennedy was killed, and many may have benefited from it. Perfectly natural to think these people may have helped make it happen. Oliver Stone's version of the events has been discredited on many fronts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.