kamui Posted January 16, 2009 Report Share Posted January 16, 2009 Thanks KS, it was about time! :thumbup: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old Hippie Posted January 16, 2009 Report Share Posted January 16, 2009 O.k. No doubt the guy wants us talking about him. Don't give him what he wants. He is gone Thank fuck, so let him and the issue go away. Not aimed at Kamui, just a general statement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
playtheblues Posted January 16, 2009 Report Share Posted January 16, 2009 (not to anybody particular) The political bias on this board is so single-mindedly to the left (and anti-Israel) that I believe Rogueyan was hated very much just because he expressed conservative values. His offensive, insulting provocations, bordering on sheer sociopaty, did not help him of course. Nor did his behaviour promote the conservative cause. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Al Posted January 16, 2009 Report Share Posted January 16, 2009 I think robaus nailed him. He was a Zionist propagandist. Nothing wrong with that but I still can't figure out why he spent so much time on us. Right. Early on I looked at his posts in the "find all posts by user" and could find nothing on LOS. I mean, where is his favorite place to buy whores? Even nothing in the way of someone wanting some mundane tourist info. WTF? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chuckwoww Posted January 16, 2009 Report Share Posted January 16, 2009 I dunno....should we be talking about him at all? I see OH has already made a ruling. I did find him arrogant but interesting. But he's not here to defend himself so that's my last comment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
khunsanuk Posted January 17, 2009 Author Report Share Posted January 17, 2009 Hi, "should we be talking about him at all?" No, we shouldn't. He can no longer defend himself and I would therefore very much like it if he is not talked about anymore. This thread is about the posting behavior of everyone, it is not about the banning of 2 people. Sanuk! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buffalo_bill Posted January 17, 2009 Report Share Posted January 17, 2009 Would it be allowed to flame somebody if the poster includes himself , example : [color:gray]Buffalo_Bill and Old_Hippie are the greatest arseholes ever seen on the surface of the earth .[/color] But then followed by : The longer I think about it , only one of them is . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
samak Posted January 17, 2009 Report Share Posted January 17, 2009 But then followed by : The longer I think about it , only one of them is . unspecific posts are not very helpful! so speak out! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lobert Posted January 17, 2009 Report Share Posted January 17, 2009 KS I am very glad to hear this. You doing exactly the right thing. This is an excellent forum that gets some very interesting posts and points of view. If the discussions and disagreements can be kept civilized and mature then you will start getting more new posters and some fresh input. I'd also like to suggest that posters respect other posters opinions. There is often no single correct answer or point of view, such as how much to pay a BG. Good luck with your new approach, I think it will pay off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drogon Posted January 17, 2009 Report Share Posted January 17, 2009 I am pro Israel (although I don't agree with their current "way of handling things") and I have not been banned.... So saying that RY has been banned for his political position (and I am a leftist pro Israel) is not a valid argument to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.