Evel_Penivel Posted November 27, 2006 Report Share Posted November 27, 2006 From John Galt's site: "I have decided to take a break from the not-stickman column, because well, you know I need to concentrate on my business The break is needed....but it is not permanent." And from Stickman's site: "I have decided to take a short break from updating this site to concentrate on my day job. The break is needed, but not permanent. Full service will resume soon..." The net result for Galt is that through his aggression, he's apparently taken Stickman out, but himself as well. Remains to be seen if it an end to hostilities from Galt's side (doubtful). In the end, what did Galt accomplish? Evel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buffalo_bill Posted November 27, 2006 Report Share Posted November 27, 2006 " In the end, what did Galt accomplish? " Unfortunately all he wanted : to land a knockout on Stick's site and to become famous. This fellow does not act on a rational basis , therefore you would not understand him from that end . Remains to be seen what the final result will be , cannot believe Stick resigns because of such a sick character . BuBi Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChristianTroy Posted November 27, 2006 Report Share Posted November 27, 2006 From John Galt's site: "I have decided to take a break from the not-stickman column, because well, you know I need to concentrate on my business The break is needed....but it is not permanent." It is permanent!!! Galts site goes down, he had his fifteen minutes and now things came up about him you better don't post here! Some people mentionend it on Mangosauce and it appears to be true! Galt was playing with is life, this is the only way. Question: how hard would it be to bribe a 13yo girl to claim he raped her? :grin: Who would they rather believe since there seems to be a history with underaged girls! Not saying it was true, just rumors! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unit731 Posted November 28, 2006 Report Share Posted November 28, 2006 Ouch ! I read all. I'm moving to a monastary that has no computers! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flashermac Posted November 28, 2006 Report Share Posted November 28, 2006 People who live in grass houses shouldn't play with matches ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlazingStarz Posted November 28, 2006 Report Share Posted November 28, 2006 http://www.stickboybangkok.com/ The saga continues Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boring_Man Posted November 28, 2006 Report Share Posted November 28, 2006 It's nice to see paul101/thai3 back, spreading his message of joy and disapproval. Bibblies, how could you not have noticed? As far as my own message of joy and disapproval, my objections to Stickman involved a certain amount of rumor-mongering, what I felt was a rather hypocritical attitude toward the, ahem, "nightlife industry", and his PI business. The latter I found especially silly, as if people really believe that an English teacher/website owner/"nightlife expert" actually has the experience and training to do a real investigation. For heaven's sake, there are real PIs out there already catering to the suspicious. Caveat emptor. Of, course none of this justifies Galt's actions in any way Tangentially, what's so wrong with checking out a girl? There are countless posts in numerous threads to the effect of "what did you expect, you're a knucklehead to get involved with a bargirl," and "ha, ha, ha, she was on the phone with her sponsor while I was fucking her," so why shouldn't a concerned boyfriend/sponsor/husband buy a little peace of mind before he buys that house or water buffalo? Trust, but verify. If it was good enough for Reagan, why not John Punter? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nervous_Dog Posted November 28, 2006 Report Share Posted November 28, 2006 In his mind, "I won because I destroyed the ememy" the fact he has lost doesn;t diminish the fact he won. DOG Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MooNoi Posted November 28, 2006 Report Share Posted November 28, 2006 In his mind, "I won because I destroyed the ememy" the fact he has lost doesn;t diminish the fact he won. DOG I'm just trying to get my head around that, and I *THINK* I know what you're saying, Doggie... Far too early in the day at the moment to tink too mutt! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nervous_Dog Posted November 28, 2006 Report Share Posted November 28, 2006 Basically he doesn;t care if he looses, as long as Stick looses, in other words MAD - Mutually Assued Destruction! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.